226th day of violation my abducted, missing son’s,, inherent birth rights

DAY 226/227 OF STANDING UP FOR MINE AND MY DEFENCELESS CHILD’S INHERENT (AND HUMAN), RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS! SOMEBODY HAS TO BE A VOICE FOR THE ABUSED, ABDUCTED, MISSING, DRUGGED, DECEIVED, ENSLAVED AND ALIENATED! WHO BETTER THAN HIS FATHER! MILO ALLODIUS ApSTEWART IS THE SON OF A WOLF, NOT A SHEPHARD OR SHEEP.

“The shepherd drives the wolf from the sheep’s for which the sheep thanks the shepherd as his liberator, while the wolf denounces him for the same act as the destroyer of liberty. Plainly, the sheep and the wolf are not agreed upon a definition of liberty” Abraham Lincoln

 I’VE BEEN DISCREDITED, VILIFIED, EXCOMMUNICATED AND SYSTEMATICALLY CRIMINALISED, FOR REPORTING THIS STATE-SPONSORED CRIME, AGAINST MY OWN DEFENCELESS LITTLE BOY! HERE ARE ALL MY RIGHTS WHICH HAVE BEEN VIOLATED, BELOW ARE ALL MY CHILD’S RIGHTS WHICH HAVE BEEN VIOLATED.

“NO Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgement of his Peers, or by the Law of the land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right” Clause 29 of the 1297 Magna Carta Charter  (still on statute)

“To live outside the law, you must be honest” Bob Dylan

More details, evidence, claims and public appeal, (from me and my boy, (me on his behalf), can be found on my last blog post http://milostewart.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/223rd-day-of-successive-abuse-of-my.html – I recently decided to directly ask David Cameron to get his rouge Government, Court’s and Police in some order and respect mine and my son’s human rights, because this is TYRANNY! He is after all, the man who got his Lordship, Sir Andrew McFarlane into office, as the justice of appeals at the high court. Someone I have already begun speaking to about these crimes against mine and my son’s humanity.

The outcome of my report to the high court and his his Lordship, Sir Andrew McFarlane about my abducted child being maliciously kept form other children, his father, his father’s side of the family, physically abused, abducted, groomed, drugged, enslaved, renamed, held captive at an unknown location and subjected to poverty, forced fatherlessness, welfare-state aid, mental illnesses, deceit and lies and exposed to risks of more physical harm and his mothers family cycle of child sex abuse. And it’s all being done by a STATE-SPONSORED physically abusive mother and her own abuser (my son’s child molesting grandfather). WHEN MY SON HAS INHERENT RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS AND A PERFECTLY GOOD FATHER AND HOME AND A LIFE OF PEACE AND ABUNDANCE. AND A FAMILY WHO WOULD’NT DREAM OF SUBJECTING A DEFENCELESS CHILD TO THESE HORRIFIC INJUSTICES OF PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE FORMS OF ABUSE. Here’s more evidence that these 229 DAYS OF CRIMES, against me and my abducted, missing son are STATE-SPONSORED. And my reasons for my response to unsubscribe and leave the tyranny and false democracy that is the United Kingdom Corporation. A foreign owned cartel-militia which has hijacked my Queens Kingdom and mine and my son’s birth land.

I cannot wait until my son learns of these injustices against him and me so that he can liberate himself from his captors, abductors, deceivers and abusers. Primarily his weak, exploited, misguided, indoctrinated, satanist, malicious NAZI mother …

/……But I pray it never comes to this and that we find middle ground and cause for a peaceful private life again, for the sake of our beautiful new creation.

Last week this member of the Stewart family assured me my son is alive. Why is there so much violence in this family? How can an infant boy be subjected to such barbaric, malicious and abusive people?  

13.11.12 – Deborah used me as her personal money mule, to do some tax evasion of overseas undeclared income. (I also put £75 in her account in good faith to avoid the possibility of her getting charges, because I’m good like that…. and we’d only been dating 3 months by that time).

31.01.13 – After dumping Deborah for witnessing her psychotic, erratic episodes over Christmas …Deborah called to tell me she was pregnant. I flew out to be by her side and begin supporting her and my child and to the best of my ability. I gave our relationship another chance but because of my concerns for her mental health I RECORDED EVERYTHING FROM THIS POINT FORWARD! and a bloody good job I did as well. I had no idea how bad her illness was and I had no idea it could lead to the physical abuse of our 36 day old child followed by a malicious cover-up campaign by her entire family. Our first stop in Jan 2013 was to see the doctor in LaRomana. As always, Deborah laughs at the poor pseudo-advice of her misleaders (in this case her sister in Law, Lisa Stewart).

05.02.13 – Second visit to the Doctor and Deborah demonstrates how ‘stressed’ & ‘anxious’ she gets about the smallest things. My high standards and competence are once again evident in this recording.

19.03.13 – Third visit to the Dominican Doctor. Deborah says how her head teacher ‘Harry MaGee’ ‘understand her’. I later learnt this meant they were having sex…and along with other men Deborah regularly had unprotected sex, caused Deborah to go into a state panic and extreme anxiety about her routine HIV test later that year. This seems to be the reason Mr MaGee of Abraham School, LaRomana, helped Deborah with her camping to hide child abuse (instead of looking out for an abused child as is his duty as someone trusted to protect children ** NOT CORRUPT TEACHERS **) and this seems to be why this corrupt headmaster helped Deborah and her family obstruct me and my son from our new home in Casa De Campo, after Deborah and her corrupt family had already lost me and my son our old home. Harry also emailed everyone, instructing them not to communicate with me in order to obstruct me getting testimonies from Deborah’s former colleagues about her psychotic, abusive nature. 

20.04.2013 – Example of a typical day with Deborah, showing how utterly in need of care she is. There is no way this woman can properly care for our abducted child she continues to hold captivate and hide from his father, she can’t look after herself. The sat nav dies and she has a total meltdown. I get some snacks , “£10 ???” she complains. “I hate chicken” she complains. Sat Nav breaks. Deborah wines, stresses, flapps, shows how much of a child she is. “I don’t know what to do” she cries, get’s upset,,, sobs some more ” I hate being late”. Shall we print a map?, shall I give you directions by phone? Shall I get my laptop and come with you?” I say. “I don’t know how to get there”, Sob sob, flap flap!!! why’s it not working”, “I hate being late” sob sob. “ummmm ummmmm, I don’t know what to do”…….sob sob. COMPLETE MELTDOWN! Imagine what she’s like with a child, same thing. Complete meltdown each time our son cried in the night. This woman is not mentally, financially or emotionally ready or mature enough for the responsibility of proper care of the abducted child she holds captive and abuses, for the 225th Day!

07.10.2013 – At the hospital. We arrived mid day on the 6th in an ambulance after there were complication at the home birth. I was forced to leave the hospital at 8pm, so I return 12pm the next day to collect Deborah and our son. A total of 6 hours at the hospital. The maximum window between Deborah arriving and leaving. In one of 35 lies to the court, after Deborah mislead police and abducted our son, Deborah alleged that I was ‘keeping her family from coming to the hospital’ and isolating her from her family. Since we were in the same district as Deborah’s family, who we met up with 3+ times a week, AWAY FROM ALL OF MY FAMILY AND FRIENDS WHO ARE YET TO EVEN MEET MY SON, I’d say that’s a sick lie. The purposes of the Non Molest Order Deborah applied for was to buy her time as she planned her cover up story while her and her sick family emotionally tortured and tormented me, and bait and aggravate me, using my abducted, missing child, so that I would react and fulfil her false claims that I’m threatening and aggressive. The fact remains they are the only people to cause actual harm and loss to my son, I continue to provide him a willing and able, loving and caring father, private health care, an awesome home and I continue to protect his rights and freedoms while his state-sponsored, malicious and physically abusive mother and child molesting grandfather, continues to violate mine and my son’s rights and keep us apart, for a 227th day. The hospital were great, but after the birth the Tyranny began. They unlawfully had a dig at us because we hadn’t named our child, they insisted we not go home without giving us a valid reason. They delayed and obstructed us leaving. They told us they’d tagged our child without our knowledge or consent, a clear attempt to deceive, so that even we couldn’t leave with our own child at our own accord. Complete Tyranny.

(Soundclip coming soon)

07.10.2013 – On the way home from hospital after Milo’s birth. Deborah says on route the car “how nice it was to have me there” making no complaints about me, she even says in another call recording that I was fantastic throughout the entire birth, despite her disproportionate fears and concerns that I wouldn’t be, and her malicious threats that I would not be invited to attend the birth (all recorded, all coming soon to my blog). Despite this Deborah alleged to the court, in her attempt to justify child abuse, abduction and forced-fatherlessness, (and stall justice while her and her family use my child to ramson, emotionally torture and torment me)  that I was keeping her parents from visiting her at the hospital. (last time I do anything for this disloyal, ungrateful, malicious, deceiving and calculating woman). Deborah expresses a worry that her mother has decided that she is coming to our home, a clear affirmation that her parents were pushy and controlling and intrusive in our lives. I responded saying for Deborah to worry about herself first and that anyone appearing on our doorstep will not inherently be invited into our home. Deborah said to one of the midwives was “crap” and she wasn’t happy a trainee was at the birth, “no acceptable”. I applauded Deborah for the birth and not sleeping in 60 hours. “He’s like his daddy” she says. No issue with her parents not being at the hospital, despite her making out to the court I alienated her from her family during the birth, despite her not wanting them invoved. Debs said her brother’s coming up, I said cool. I replied saying my mum is also going to come up, Deborah said ‘yehhhhh’ concerningly. A clear indicator she was already potting her alienation campaign. I emphasised my excitement about being a new young family at our home. We agreed that we both upset easily; Deborah, if people don’t speak to her in a nice manner and me if my constitution: e.g rights and freedoms are violated. I suggest Deborah mediate through me so that her anger isn’t exposed to those who aren’t aware of her malicious, angry nature. Deborah ends the recording by saying that she believes she’s a lot more “mellow” now. Evidently not. This also implies and affirms all of my claims (and evidence) about her previous acts of malice and anger and inability to control her feelings and emotions.

12.12.2013 – One of the last calls I had with my child’s malicious mother, pretty nice chat in all. But this call does confirm her malicious father was baiting and aggravating me to drive me away and hijack my responsibilities as a father (groom my child), confirms he does get ‘angry’ but is ‘calm’ (and calculated). Confirms I am willing to take responsibility and admission for my words, upset and reactions; Confirms Deborah has no mercy or remorse, admission of her wrongdoing etc. Will not discuss, face or acknowledge her acts of malice and abuse, completely unrelenting. Confirms how confused, forgetful and blond-dizzy he is. Confirms that Deborah agrees that we can sort things out when we speak, nevertheless she has excommunicated me from my abducted, missing son’s life and hides behind her father and lawyer who then all mislead and deceive court and police to try covering up what they’re doing to me and my son. Confirms I tried to sit down and talk to Deborah on the 15th Nov 2013 but she was being crazy. Confirms Deborah believes I ran away, (when it was her that ran away and locked me out), confirms I did not react to these delusion and fantasy worlds of hers. Confirms how difficult I find it to stay away from my son in protest of Deborah’s false allegations and her untreated sickness, malice and abuse of our child. Confirms how materialistic Deborah is, more concerned about a toy for our son than him having a father. Admits she smothers our child and is way too close to him (leaving no room or concern about him having his father in his life). (Confirms she believes on her own head she’s not a sheep or agent of the state; yet she’s a welfare/state-benefit mother of a forced-fatherless, exploited, abused child, responding to the demands of the state, not the needs of our young family and son). Confirms he’s underweight (likely unhappy missing his dad). This is one of the last times I had any news on the development and well being of my abducted, missing son.

 

27.12.2013 – Call Recording from mine and my son’s home – Family friend of the Stewart family confirms ransom of my child for money, confirms the secret re-housing of my abducted child, (deception and lies, saying I abandoned my son when I was being kept from him, etc), confirms alienation from me, his father and family and our home. This man confirms the grooming of my child by his suspected child-molester grandfather and this man’s bizarre nature and his attempts to bait and aggravate me. Confirms the arrest of Jeremy Stewart, (the brother of my child’s mother) and his social awkwardness and weirdness ( no doubt drug abuse). Confirms Deborah’s malice and deception (including lying to her own family) and her purposeful escalation of this situation including contacting child social services, confirmation that they attempted to frame me, confirm their false behaviour, including that I am a threat. Confirms their family are drug-abusers, hippy-satanists (chanting, drumming etc) and complete socially awkward fraudsters and believe themselves to be above the law. Confirms Peter Stewart (the other brother of my child’s mother) instigated the cyber warfare (hacking, tapping etc) and also baits and aggravates me. confirms Deborah is a psychopath. Confirm I operate in good faith, I’m humble, just, fair and I don’t easily get angry or upset, no previous arrests/ criminal convictions. Confirms I will not be ejected from my child’s life in these ways and that I will not abandon my responsibilities as a father. Confirms I was calm and intentional when I prepared our furniture for disposal, not angry, mad etc. Confirms I remained faithful in our relationship. I contemplated doing to her cat what she’s doing to our child but I couldn’t bring myself to doing this to an animal SO HOW IS THIS WOMAN BEING ALLOWED TO HOLD ONTO A CHILD SHE PHYSICALLY ABUSED, ABDUCTED AND HOLDS CAPTIVE AT AN UNKNOWN LOCATION AND USES FOR RANSOM AND EMOTIONAL TORTURE TO FORCE FATHERLESSNESS ONTO HIM? 

08.10.2013 – In this recording, Deborah confirms Milo was with his father, skin to skin after the birth, and the stronger bond was with his father. For Deborah to maliciously keep our 36 day old from another infant, (violently grip him to accomplish this horrific act of malice) then abduct and keep him from his familiar home and surroundings (and hide and alienate him from his father, while she attempts to discredit, frame and even criminalise me to get away with child abuse, at the expense of our child) for the last 227 DAYS WITHOUT ANY REMORSE…… IS EVIDENTLY NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR LITTLE BOY! I continue to be a voice for my abducted, missing son and remain in absolute protest of everything that is being done to him by his malicious, physically and emotionally abusive mother and child molesting grandfather e.g. his abusers, abductors and captors. Deborah admits to getting ‘worked up’, ‘stressed’ and this stopped her producing breast milk. She also admitted to this happening again during a call to my mother over Christmas 2013. Combined with Deborah’s disproportionate levels of distress, fear and anxiety (as well as her erratic, psychotic episodes and meltdowns) THIS SICK WOMAN IS A SERIOUS RISK TO OUR SON. She is in need of care, SHE IS NOT READY, ABLE OR IN A POSITION TO PROPERLY CARE FOR MY ABDUCTED, MISSING SON.

(Soundclip coming soon)

Day 231 – Video Appeal to my son’s mother to stop doing this to our son, and me

———————————————FYI —————————————————

The Rights of the Child. 

Article 1 (Definition of the child): The Convention defines a ‘child’ as a person below the age of 18, 

unless the laws of a particular country set the legal age for adulthood younger. The Committee on the 

Rights of the Child, the monitoring body for the Convention, has encouraged States to review the age of 

majority if it is set below 18 and to increase the level of protection for all children under 18.

‘Person’/ ‘child’ are legalise terms. My son whom me and his mother created, (Milo Allodius ApStewart), is not the legal person/ title that has been ascribed to him by way of abduction and complete disregard by the state and his abductor, for his inherent rights, title and the democratic process e.g. the right of his creators to chose and consent on his behalf, to be governed by the state in power. http://issuu.com/hywelapbuckler/docs/first_reponse_to_registry_office_08

Article 2 (Non-discrimination): The Convention applies to all children, whatever their race, religion or 

abilities; whatever they think or say, whatever type of family they come from. It doesn’t matter where

children live, what language they speak, what their parents do, whether they are boys or girls, what their 

culture is, whether they have a disability or whether they are rich or poor. No child should be treated 

unfairly on any basis. 

My son is the son free man of Britain. I am a man standing up against his misguided mother’s violations of his human rights and cover-up campaign, AND challenging my Government’s claim that we live in a democracy, when it is really a false-democracy/ Tyranny. This is being held against my abducted missing son. He is being denied and hidden from his father, kept from our home and used as ransom by the state and his abusive mother, to try and get me into contract with them. To try and get me to return money which I am in receipt of. Further to this, I have also being discredited, vilified and chased from my home, country and son…. and outlawed: A COMPLETE VIOLATION OF CLAUSE 29 MAGNA CARTA CHARTER 1297 (as seen above) 

Article 3 (Best interests of the child): The best interests of children must be the primary concern in 

making decisions that may affect them. All adults should do what is best for children. When adults make

decisions, they should think about how their decisions will affect children. This particularly applies to 

budget, policy and law makers.

My position remains unchanged, I am in absolute protest of all that is being done to my abused, abducted, deceived, enslaved, drugged, groomed, missing child. Who’s malicious mother is not only jobless, moneyless, abusive and reckless but is incestuous with her own abuser and child-molesting father.  They are using my child to ransom me for money, emotionally torture me, excommunicate me into giving up n my son, in order to disguise the evident risk they pose to his de-railed life and portray to the authorities they deceive, that he is better abducted in their captivity than returned to his willing and loving father and our home. 

Article 4 (Protection of rights): Governments have a responsibility to take all available measures to 

make sure children’s rights are respected, protected and fulfilled. When countries ratify the Convention, 

they agree to review their laws relating to children. This involves assessing their social services, legal, 

health and educational systems, as well as levels of funding for these services. Governments are then 

obliged to take all necessary steps to ensure that the minimum standards set by the Convention in these 

areas are being met. They must help families protect children’s rights and create an environment where

they can grow and reach their potential. In some instances, this may involve changing existing laws or 

creating new ones. Such legislative changes are not imposed, but come about through the same process

by which any law is created or reformed within a country. Article 41 of the Convention points out the when 

a country already has higher legal standards than those seen in the Convention, the higher standards

always prevail.

This is the 226th day since my son’s abduction and nobody will even tell me if he is still alive. The state are using child protection statutes to help the pro-long his captivity at the unknown address of his abuser and abductor. Saying that to rescue my abducted boy from his current circumstance and return him home to his father and home and life of peace, would in itself, be abduction. 

Article 5 (Parental guidance): Governments should respect the rights and responsibilities of families to 

direct and guide their children so that, as they grow, they learn to use their rights properly. Helping

children to understand their rights does not mean pushing them to make choices with consequences that 

they are too young to handle. Article 5 encourages parents to deal with rights issues “in a manner

consistent with the evolving capacities of the child”. The Convention does not take responsibility for 

children away from their parents and give more authority to governments. It does place on governments

the responsibility to protect and assist families in fulfilling their essential role as nurturers of children.

My son’s rights have nearly all been violated as you can see from this blog and extract from the UN convention of rights of a child. He is also being kept from me as I attempt to stand up for his inherent birth rights and freedoms of our British shores, as well as the ones of his legal person which the state are bound to protect as part of this treaty. No doubt he will be kept from the internet for fear he will have communication with his outlawed, vilified father or learn the truth about his circumstances and indoctrination. 

Article 6 (Survival and development): Children have the right to live. Governments should ensure that 

children survive and develop healthily. 

My son’s abduction and alienation from his father has already resulted in him losing weight (or not gaining it at a healthy rate). His mental health will also be affected by parental alienation and the distrust he will have for his own mother for her instance to pro-long this gross violation of his most basic human rights. Boy’s losing trust for their own mothers results in the chronic source of most horrific crimes, the cycle of child sex and drug abuse which exists in his captors and abductors family household, combined with the evident malice and physical abuse I witnessed, in addition to his abduction, renaming, alienation and SHOWS MY ABDUCTED MISSING CHILD IS IN REAL AND| IMMEDIATE DANGER OF POOR, IMPROPER DEVELOPMENT, SELF HARM, DEPRESSION, ANXIETY ETC!! 

Article 7 (Registration, name, nationality, care): All children have the right to a legally registered name,

officially recognised by the government. Children have the right to a nationality (to belong to a country).

Children also have the right to know and, as far as possible, to be cared for by their parents.

He is not being denied this right by his father, but I am demanding the proper challenge and consent be in place and our rights and constitution of our land respected, to make sure we are not in a TYRANNY or FALSE-DEMOCRACY.. THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT AND MY MISSING SON’S PASSIFIED ABDUCTORS AND CAPTORS, HAVE FAILED THIS CHALLENGE. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT EVERYTHING HITLER DID, WAS LEGAL.

Article 8 (Preservation of identity): Children have the right to an identity – an official record of who they 

are. Governments should respect children’s right to a name, a nationality and family ties. 

My son is being denied contact and ties to his family, father, my community and his inherent title which is MILO ALLODIUS ApSTEWART ( ap being my native (welsh) patronymic ‘ap’, meaning ‘of the family’ ….and ‘Allodius’ being my input into his inherent equitable title. Allodial is the highest form of ownership which is usually reserved for ‘settlers’ on land/ governments. Since I believe this custom will evolve due to technology, I think this name I bestowed upon my first son is significant to the day and age he has been born into. 

Article 9 (Separation from parents): Children have the right to live with their parent(s), unless it is bad 

for them. Children whose parents do not live together have the right to stay in contact with both parents,

unless this might hurt the child. 

Article 10 (Family reunification): Families whose members live in different countries should be allowed

to move between those countries so that parents and children can stay in contact, or get back together as

a family.

The state, which does not have lawful jurisdiction of my abducted, missing child,  has suggested to my childs abuser, abductor and captor, that an application be made to the passport office to deny my son a passport and maintain his captivity in their tyranny and the captivity of his abuser, abductor and captors. 

For every child – Health, Education, Equality, Protection ADVANCE HUMANITY

Article 11 (Kidnapping): Governments should take steps to stop children being taken out of their own 

country illegally. This article is particularly concerned with parental abductions. The Convention’s Optional

Protocol on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography has a provision that concerns

abduction for financial gain.

My son has been kidnapped from his country of Birth and jurisdiction of our common law: BRITAIN, and  unlawfully and unconstitutionally contracted as a citizen (by way of abduction and disregard of my denial of consent) into the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION/ SOCIETY and subjected to it’s tyranny and repressive jurisdiction. His inherent rights, equitable title and estate, his father and home and more…. are all being kept from him by the state and his captors.

Article 12 (Respect for the views of the child): When adults are making decisions that affect children,

children have the right to say what they think should happen and have their opinions taken into account.

This does not mean that children can now tell their parents what to do. This Convention encourages

adults to listen to the opinions of children and involve them in decision-making — not give children

authority over adults. Article 12 does not interfere with parents’ right and responsibility to express their

views on matters affecting their children. Moreover, the Convention recognises that the level of a child’s

participation in decisions must be appropriate to the child’s level of maturity. Children’s ability to form and 

express their opinions develops with age and most adults will naturally give the views of teenagers

greater weight than those of a preschooler, whether in family, legal or administrative decisions.

Article 12 (Respect for the views of the child): When adults are making decisions that affect children,

children have the right to say what they think should happen and have their opinions taken into account.

Article 13 (Freedom of expression): Children have the right to get and share information, as long as the 

information is not damaging to them or others. In exercising the right to freedom of expression, children 

have the responsibility to also respect the rights, freedoms and reputations of others. The freedom of 

expression includes the right to share information in any way they choose, including by talking, drawing or

writing.

Article 14 (Freedom of thought, conscience and religion): Children have the right to think and believe

what they want and to practise their religion, as long as they are not stopping other people from enjoying 

their rights. Parents should help guide their children in these matters. The Convention respects the rights

and duties of parents in providing religious and moral guidance to their children. Religious groups around

the world have expressed support for the Convention, which indicates that it in no way prevents parents

from bringing their children up within a religious tradition. At the same time, the Convention recognises

that as children mature and are able to form their own views, some may question certain religious

practises or cultural traditions. The Convention supports children’s right to examine their beliefs, but it 

also states that their right to express their beliefs implies respect for the rights and freedoms of others.

My son is entitled to share my beliefs and freedom of thought as his father, he is being kept from me and my beliefs and culture and language, it is being done by way of abduction and alienation. 

Article 15 (Freedom of association): Children have the right to meet together and to join groups and

organisations, as long as it does not stop other people from enjoying their rights. In exercising their rights,

children have the responsibility to respect the rights, freedoms and reputations of others. 

My son’s mother violently gripped our child to maliciously keep him from meeting another infant child who was brought to our home so the two could meet. 

Article 16 (Right to privacy): Children have a right to privacy. The law should protect them from attacks 

against their way of life, their good name, their families and their homes.

My child’s and his father’s good name are both under attack. Our homes and life of peace have been under attack and lost, 3 times. I am now at our fourth home while he remains abducted and missing and his captors and abductors will not communicate with me, except to bait and aggravate me and serve me forged warrants and orders for my ‘words’ and ’emails’ expressing upset and anger. 

Article 17 (Access to information; mass media): Children have the right to get information that is 

important to their health and well-being. Governments should encourage mass media – radio, television, 

newspapers and Internet content sources – to provide information that children can understand and to not 

promote materials that could harm children. Mass media should particularly be encouraged to supply

information in languages that minority and indigenous children can understand. Children should also have

access to children’s books.

There are already stories being made, by my child’s abductors and captors to indoctrinate my son into believing I abandoned my son. The truth is: he was abducted from our home and continues to be held captive at an unknown location (for the 226th Day). I continue to appeal to his abductors and captors to stop doing this to my abducted, missing child and seek professional help as trying to force my son to fatherlessness by trying to chase me from his life while using him for ransom and emotional torture… is a sick thing to do to a child. While I was vilified and obstructed from being near my abducted, re-housed, missing son (by way of false allegations that I was a threat), then I was illegally evicted and chased from our home (by way of false allegations to police and our landlord). Then chased from my abducted, missing son and my own country and life of peace (after his malicious mother made false complaints to police, and false applications to the courts. This resulted in unlawful warrants and deceiving, surprise attempts to arrest me AND unlawful orders to systematically criminalise me. The state is completely disregarding all of these violations of mine and my child’s rights until I enter into contract. I refuse to contract. I want no part in this child abuse cover up or tyranny. I cannot believe it has been allowed to go on for the 226th day without intervention. MY CHILD HAS BEEN ABUSED, ABDUCTED AND HELP CAPTIVE FOR 226 DAYS AND STILL….NOBODY WILL TELL ME IF HE’S ALIVE OR WHERE HE’S BEING HELD CAPTIVE! 

Article 18 (Parental responsibilities; state assistance): Both parents share responsibility for bringing

up their children, and should always consider what is best for each child. Governments must respect the 

responsibility of parents for providing appropriate guidance to their children – the Convention does not 

take responsibility for children away from their parents and give more authority to governments. It places 

a responsibility on governments to provide support services to parents, especially if both parents work 

outside the home.

I am being robbed of my responsibilities as well as my child. While my child’s abuser, abductor and captor (his sick mother) is lumbering her responsibilities onto the state, her family and anyone else she can find while she campaigns to make our child fatherless. There is no regard for what is best for our child from the mother. She is responsible for the complete demise of our child’s life, from a peaceful and abundant life at our private countryside estate with both parents, to abuse (actual harm), abduction, deceit, child-grooming, risk of more actual harm, fatherlessness, enslavement, ransom, emotional torture, renaming, captivity at an undisclosed address, poverty, violation of rights and freedoms. The Government is, for the 226th Day, still unable to confirm if my abducted, missing son is still alive. HOW IS THIS SUPPORTING ME. This is simply supporting a malicious mother with her use of our child for ransom and emotional torture. I WILL NOT ENTER INTO CONTRACT. WHAT YOU ARE DOING WITH MY ABDUCTED SON IS RANSOM. 

The contradiction and double standards of the state and my child’s abductors and captors is incredible. They won’t let me know if my son’s alive until I enter into contract, yet they ascribe legal title to me unconsciously to make it appeal as if I have contracted. The attempt to deceive me and my son and disregard the constitution and Magna Carta Charter, is relentless. 

Article 19 (Protection from all forms of violence): Children have the right to be protected from being

hurt and mistreated, physically or mentally. Governments should ensure that children are properly cared

for and protect them from violence, abuse and neglect by their parents, or anyone else who looks after 

For every child

Not only did I witness my son’s sick mother physically abuse our child to vent her anger and upset and maliciously keep our son from meeting another child (the infant daughter of a friend of mine) but my child’s sick mother then abducted our child and campaigned to discredit me to get away with child abuse instead of seeking professional help. 

Health, Education, Equality, Protection  – ADVANCE HUMANITY

In terms of discipline, the Convention does not specify what forms of punishment parents should

use. However any form of discipline involving violence is unacceptable. There are ways to discipline

children that are effective in helping children learn about family and social expectations for their behaviour

– ones that are non-violent, are appropriate to the child’s level of development and take the best interests

of the child into consideration. In most countries, laws already define what sorts of punishments are 

considered excessive or abusive. It is up to each government to review these laws in light of the 

Convention.

The only actual harm and loss and exploitation of my child, has come from his mother and her family. My child’s only experience of a high standard of living and proper protection and care is from his father. I SPEAK ON BEHALF OF MY CHILD WHO WILL KNOW NOTHING MORE THAN HIS EXPERIENCES AS A 7MONTH OLD. 226 days since he was distressed, physically abused and abducted from his life of peace, home and kept hidden and alienated from his father, at 36 days old …..by his malicious, deceitful, physically abusive mother and child-molesting grandfather e,g his abductors, captors and abusers. 

Article 20 (Children deprived of family environment): Children who cannot be looked after by their 

own family have a right to special care and must be looked after properly, by people who respect their 

ethnic group, religion, culture and language.

My child’s abusers, captors, abductors and exploiters are also depriving my missing son of his father’s culture, language and religious views. 

Article 21 (Adoption): Children have the right to care and protection if they are adopted or in foster care.

The first concern must be what is best for them. The same rules should apply whether they are adopted

in the country where they were born, or if they are taken to live in another country.

Article 22 (Refugee children): Children have the right to special protection and help if they are refugees

(if they have been forced to leave their home and live in another country), as well as all the rights in this 

Convention.

Article 23 (Children with disabilities): Children who have any kind of disability have the right to special

care and support, as well as all the rights in the Convention, so that they can live full and independent

lives.

Article 24 (Health and health services): Children have the right to good quality health care – the best 

health care possible – to safe drinking water, nutritious food, a clean and safe environment, and 

information to help them stay healthy. Rich countries should help poorer countries achieve this.

I offer my child private health care, this was true before and after his birth and found in evidence. His abductors and captors are now subjecting my abducted, missing child to regular, state health care (NOT THE BEST POSSIBLE) not a safe environment as he HAS BEEN HARMED, HAS BEEN EXPOSED TO MORE PHYSICAL HARM AND EXPOSURE TO DRUG, ALCOHOL AND A FAMILY CYCLE OF CHILD-SEX ABUSE). While his rights and freedoms are all being violated, including his right to live in peace, a right to a father, etc …my abducted missing son is also being subsequently denied the information I am broadcasting about his rights and freedoms which would help him to stay safe and healthy. Knowing about your inherent rights and freedoms and inherent title, is not taught in schools nor did I learn about constitution, common law and lawfulness in my military career. This information is not for citizens to know because it’s not advantageous to a state and/or their jurisdiction.  

Article 25 (Review of treatment in care): Children who are looked after by their local authorities, rather 

than their parents, have the right to have these living arrangements looked at regularly to see if they are 

the most appropriate. Their care and treatment should always be based on “the best interests of the 

child”. (see Guiding Principles, Article 3)

Article 26 (Social security): Children – either through their guardians or directly – have the right to help 

from the government if they are poor or in need. 

My son and I reject these benefits and do not wish to contract with the state. My child’s mother is welcoming the benefits because she cannot fund the abuse and captivity of our child whom she abducted and continues to use for ransom and subject to poverty, forced fatherlessness and expose to the sexual abuse of a suspected child molester who has already groomed my abducted, missing son.  

Article 27 (Adequate standard of living): Children have the right to a standard of living that is good 

enough to meet their physical and mental needs. Governments should help families and guardians who

cannot afford to provide this, particularly with regard to food, clothing and housing.

My son’s standard of living may be ok, but if abuser, abductors and captors of children can provide a seemingly ok living environment, while they make successive attempts to sabotage the father and son’s homes and business and vilify and alienate, emotionally torture, bait and aggravate, frame and criminalise and outlaw the grieving, concerned father. Does this honestly constitute a decent standard of living for a child? 

Article 28: (Right to education): All children have the right to a primary education, which should be free.

Wealthy countries should help poorer countries achieve this right. Discipline in schools should respect

children’s dignity. For children to benefit from education, schools must be run in an orderly way – without 

the use of violence. Any form of school discipline should take into account the child’s human dignity.

Therefore, governments must ensure that school administrators review their discipline policies and

eliminate any discipline practises involving physical or mental violence, abuse or neglect. The Convention

places a high value on education. Young people should be encouraged to reach the highest level of 

education of which they are capable.

My son’s physically and emotionally abusive, malicious mother and child-molesting grandfather are both former teachers. It’s not likely that Deborah Stewart will ever teach again after physically abusing a 36 day old, and it’s my understand that David Stewart has already been ejected from his teaching career over concerns of the risk he poses to children. 

Article 29 (Goals of education): Children’s education should develop each child’s personality, talents 

and abilities to the fullest. It should encourage children to respect others, human rights and their own and

other cultures. It should also help them learn to live peacefully, protect the environment and respect other

people. Children have a particular responsibility to respect the rights their parents, and education should

aim to develop respect for the values and culture of their parents. The Convention does not address such

issues as school uniforms, dress codes, the singing of the national anthem or prayer in schools. It is up to 

governments and school officials in each country to determine whether, in the context of their society and 

existing laws, such matters infringe upon other rights protected by the Convention.

My son’s physically and emotionally abusive, malicious mother and child-molesting grandfather are not able to respect mine or my son’s human rights or our cultures and beliefs. Not only are they nearly all being violated at the expense of their attempt to get away with child abuse and child grooming, but my child is being kept from his inherent rights and freedoms, estate and title and his father’s values and standards.  What ‘s worse is the British Government are assisting in this child abuse/ child-grooming  cover up attempt and these violation of this disregard of democracy and these violations of mine and my abducted, missing child’s inherent rights and freedoms. 

For every child – Health, Education, Equality, Protection 

Article 30 (Children of minorities/indigenous groups): Minority or indigenous children have the right to 

learn about and practise their own culture, language and religion. The right to practise one’s own culture, 

language and religion applies to everyone; the Convention here highlights this right in instances where

the practises are not shared by the majority of people in the country.

My abducted, missing son’s physically and emotionally abusive mother and child-molesting grandfather are English. They are aristocratic and their religion seems to be Sadism. I, on the other hand am Welsh, welsh speaking, democratic and even Laissez faire… and my religion is Christianity with an appreciation for the healing study (and belief) of a Second World War British Army nurse (which founded Scientology’s Dianetics works). 

Article 31 (Leisure, play and culture): Children have the right to relax and play, and to join in a wide 

range of cultural, artistic and other recreational activities.

I am concerned that my abducted, missing son’s right to play and relax etc will be impacted by my public appeal. But I cannot be expected to stop appealing to his captors and abductors and all those who keep us apart and violate my child’s inherent rights and attack our home and life of peace together. THEY MUST STOP DOING THIS TO ME AND MY CHILD!!! THEY SHOULD DENOUNCE HIS UNLAWFUL CITIZENSHIP TO THE UNITED| KINGDOM UNTIL PROPER CONSENT IS MADE (AND/OR THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS HAS BEEN APPLIED). RETURN HIM TO HIS FATHER AND HOME AND OUR LIFE OF PEACE AND ABUNDANCE TOGETHER. STOP ATTACKING THIS AND KEEP ME AND MY SON APART FROM THIS FOR A FAIR PERIOD OF TIME (226+ DAYS). DROP ALL FALSE CLAIMS, COMPLAINTS AND APPLICATIONS… FALSIFIED WARRANTS AND ORDERS. ANYTHING WHICH VIOLATES MINE AND MY SON’S RIGHT TO LIVE IN PEACE IN OUR HOME IN OUR COUNTRY. ANY CONTRACTS WILL BE MADE CONSENSUALLY WITH PRIOR DISCUSSION, NOT BY TERRORISM, RANSOM, KIDNAP, COERCION, FORCE, MALICE AND COMPLETE DISREGARD FOR THE QUEEN, THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION AND THE COMMON LAW OF OUR LAND. 

Article 32 (Child labour): The government should protect children from work that is dangerous or might

harm their health or their education. While the Convention protects children from harmful and exploitative 

work, there is nothing in it that prohibits parents from expecting their children to help out at home in ways 

that are safe and appropriate to their age. If children help out in a family farm or business, the tasks they 

do be safe and suited to their level of development and comply with national labour laws. Children’s work 

should not jeopardise any of their other rights, including the right to education, or the right to relaxation 

and play. 

Article 33 (Drug abuse): Governments should use all means possible to protect children from the use of 

harmful drugs and from being used in the drug trade.

It is found in evidence that my son’s abusers, captors and abductors do abuse drugs, have a history of arrests. It is also found in evidence that my son was drugged by the state and his captors and abductors by way of abduction and complete disregard for my expressed denial of consent AS HIS FATHER! 

Article 34 (Sexual exploitation): Governments should protect children from all forms of sexual

exploitation and abuse. This provision in the Convention is augmented by the Optional Protocol on the 

sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.

The British Government has assisted a suspected child molester in his campaign to groom my abducted missing child.  

Article 35 (Abduction, sale and trafficking): The government should take all measures possible to 

make sure that children are not abducted, sold or trafficked. This provision in the Convention is 

augmented by the Optional Protocol on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography.

My child has been abducted and the British Government e.g. Leeds Crown Court, believe a rescue from his abductors, captors and abusers warrants abduction. Ignoring the fact his place of captivity is not residence by the unknown address of my son’s abductor and abuser. A place they can keep my son hidden from me (for the 226th success day) they use him for emotional torture to bait and aggravate me in order to systematically criminalise me, in order to force fatherlessness onto my abducted missing child and try and dis incentives me from being a voice for him as they try to get away with these violations of my abducted missing child’s human rights. 

Article 36 (Other forms of exploitation): Children should be protected from any activity that takes

advantage of them or could harm their welfare and development.

My child was not born in the 1900’s, he’s a 21st Century boy. The world is in a pickle, governance and finance included and we are moving into the technological age. As my child’s father and a tech entrepreneur, I make very careful thoughts and proper plans for my child in light of the world and time in history he has been born into. Banks and Government have been exposed for exploiting citizens, it is more important than even in this time to hang onto constitution, democracy and perform humane and lawful acts. Control, force and aristocracy is not the environment for a 21 Century child. 

Until the injustice my father suffered, at the hands of a corporation and the state, which lead to his demise and eventual death. Where there was no internet to pass on his lessons learn to me, his son. Milo Allodius ApStewart will learn of his abduction and this gross violation of his human rights and freedoms, our systematic separation and this gross attack on our civil liberties, title and estate by the state and his deceiving, malicious and abusive mother and grandfather. The consequences to them will be more than the consequences to my son who I hope will denounce his citizenship and excommunicate his mother and grandfather to hold to account and escape all the people who are doing this to me and my abducted, missing son. I HAVE NO PREVIOUS ARRESTS, CHARGES, INCIDENTS OR ANYTHING THAT WOULD ADVOCATE THAT I AM IN ANY WAY A CRIMINAL.  

Denial of consent to enter into unlawful contract with my son’s abductors and captors or the state, by way of abduction and ransom of my child or attempts to kidnap me, DOES NOT MAKE ME A CRIMINAL. 

Being my son’s voice and standing up for mine and my son’s inherent rights and freedoms as they are being violated in the most barbaric, inhumane and unlawful ways, DOES NOT MAKE ME A CRIMINAL. 

Peacefully protesting against these violations of practically all of my abducted, missing son’s inherent rights and my rights IS A RIGHT! MY ACTS OF PROTEST DO NOT MAKE ME A CRIMINAL. I WILL DO EVERYTHING IN MY POWER TO PROTEST AGAINST THIS GROSS  INJUSTICE AND ABUSE. 

Article 37 (Detention and punishment): No one is allowed to punish children in a cruel or harmful way. 

Children who break the law should not be treated cruelly. They should not be put in prison with adults, 

should be able to keep in contact with their families, and should not be sentenced to death or life

imprisonment without possibility of release. 

My abducted, missing son is being punished is many many ways by his abductors and captors and a lazy state who refuse to get their rouge citizens in order. MY SON AND I HAVE BEEN SEPARATED AND KEPT APART AND EXCOMMUNICATED FOR 226 DAYS SO THAT HIS ABUSIVE MALICIOUS MOTHER AND CHILD MOLESTING/ GROOMING GRANDFATHER CAN TRY TO GET AWAY WITH PHYSICAL ABUSE AND ABDUCTION. 

THEIR ALLEGIANCE TO THE STATE, USING LAW AND LAWYER AND THE COURT AND THE POLICE SERVICES ARE NOT IN GOOD FAITH. THEY ARE USING DEFENCE AS OFFENCE. THEIR ALLEGIANCE TO THE STATE, IN THEIR CAPACITY AS IT’S AGENTS/ CITIZENS, DOES NOT CONSTITUTE INTEGRITY. THEY ARE IN THIS AREA BECAUSE AS A FATHER IN THIS ARENA I AM POWERLESS. 

BUT AS A FREE MAN I AM NOT POWERLESS TO STAND UP AGAINST MY GOVERNMENT AND THE CORRUPTION OF:

THE STEWART FAMILY, OTLEY, WEST YORKSHIRE, U.K
WEST YORKSHIRE POLICE, U.K
LEEDS CROWN COURT, UK.
“CHILD PROTECTION” SERVICES, U.K
LEEDS CITY COUNCIL, U.K 
THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT, U.K
THE UNITED KINGDOM (CORPORATION/ SOCIETY), BRITAIN (High Court Appeal) 

My choice to remain as a free man, not a dis-empowered father-citizen, does not constitute a lack of integrity. “to live outside the law, you must be honest” Bob Dylan – I am being HONEST. I OPERATE WITH HONOUR. 

Article 38 (War and armed conflicts): Governments must do everything they can to protect and care for

children affected by war. Children under 15 should not be forced or recruited to take part in a war or join

the armed forces. The Convention’s Optional Protocol on the involvement of children in armed conflict

further develops this right, raising the age for direct participation in armed conflict to 18 and establishing a 

ban on compulsory recruitment for children under 18.

Article 39 (Rehabilitation of child victims): Children who have been neglected, abused or exploited

should receive special help to physically and psychologically recover and reintegrate into society.

Particular attention should be paid to restoring the health, self-respect and dignity of the child.

When my abducted, missing, abused, groomed, enslaved, captive, drugged and exploited child is returned home to his father, our home and our life of peace together HE WILL BE COUNSELLED TO OVERCOME THE TRAUMA OF THE LAST 226 DAYS OF TORMENT.  

Article 40 (Juvenile justice): Children who are accused of breaking the law have the right to legal help 

and fair treatment in a justice system that respects their rights. Governments are required to set a 

minimum age below which children cannot be held criminally responsible and to provide minimum

guarantees for the fairness and quick resolution of judicial or alternative proceedings.

Article 41 (Respect for superior national standards): If the laws of a country provide better protection

of children’s rights than the articles in this Convention, those laws should apply.

The laws of the land protect my son better than the laws of the state. These laws are in the constitution of the Magna Carta Charter, endorsed by the Royal Family and monarch which supersedes the British Government and the United Kingdom society, who’s regulatory statute’s are being used to prolong this injustice and abuse and de-railing of my child’s life and the standard of living I continue to provide him, a quality of life he is being kept from with nothing better on offer to him.  

Article 42 (Knowledge of rights): Governments should make the Convention known to adults and 

children. Adults should help children learn about their rights, too. (See also article 4.) 

The captors and abductors and the state are, for the 226th successive day, violating and even disregarding mine and my son’s inherent rights. There is little confidence the adults or state who abused, abducted, groomed and continue to hide my son from his father and keep from his home while they terrorise, attack and vilify me into subscribing to their passive beliefs and contracting with them, are also attempt to force fatherlessness, poverty, indoctrinated deceit and a cycle of family abuse onto him.  FOR THE 226TH DAY NOBODY WILL TELL ME IF MY ABDUCTED, MISSING SON IS EVEN STILL ALIVE. 

Articles 43-54 (implementation measures): These articles discuss how governments and international organisations like UNICEF should work to ensure children are protected in their rights. 

UNICEF WONT EVEN RESPOND TO MY EMAILS EXPRESSING MY CONCERNS ABOUT MY ABDUCTED, MISSING CHILD, OR THE ABUSE, EXPLOITATION, EMOTIONAL TORTURE AND EXPOSURE TO MORE HARM AND SEXUAL ABUSE HE HAS ALREADY ENDURED AND CONTINUES TO BE SUBJECTED TO.